Tech & IT

myonly.chat – Transform your Telegram channel into your ATM!

“ I guess we all owe it to ourselves to have a purpose in life and to use what we have to leave a legacy, create something.”

Are you a content creator or business in the adult industry trying to bring more traffic to your platform and promote it safely? Then look no further! Myonly.chat is a premium Telegram service that helps content creators or businesses sell access to their Telegram channels. It’s a subscription and tip-based, adult-friendly and safe to promote on any social media. Overall, a service that empowers content creators.
We had the pleasure to meet Andra Chirnogeanu, myonly.chat CEO, who gave us more details and insights of their recently launched app.

How did you come up with the idea to create myonly.chat?
I’ve worked in the adult industry for the last 6 years and all these years I´ve encouraged performers to take control of their content and their social media. When myonly.chat started, the idea behind it was ¨let´s do something that doesn’t put us in competition with anyone but can help everyone make more money¨. We´re not a platform, we´re providing a service, a way to make MORE money from your content, to bring more traffic to your platform, to promote it safely. I want everyone to win and it saddens me to see that in an industry so small, people are so divided.

What is the difference between myonly.chat and other similar services?
As mentioned before, myonly.chat doesn´t store content. The content is diverse, from text messages to audio, photo and video. 100% payout, the 24/7 support from our account managers, and the fact that this is not ANOTHER platform, but a service where you can monetize the content you already have. There’s also the fact that Telegram is an app that’s safe to promote on social media, it’s available for both Mac and PC, and most devices running Mac or Android.
An added benefit is push notifications, which, unlike browser notifications where fans have to opt-in, Telegram has native push right to your fan’s mobile device or laptop. And if creators needed more reasons to use the myonly.chat service, there’s also the fact that they can stream exclusive shows to their fans.

What are the goals of My Only Chat?
We´re looking at perfecting the service, making it easy to use for everyone that wants to join. The goal has always been to make people monetize what they’re good at. There is no one like you out there, and that’s something to celebrate and get money from. Nothing in this world is for free, why would your content be?

Where do you see myonly.chat in 2 years?
Hopefully fully adopted on every site that provides services, offer them our API and white label to use as a new revenue stream for their users and models.

Do you think that being a female CEO brings along more benefits, or more disadvantages?
I´ve never been a male CEO, so I wouldn´t know the difference. Timothy Leary said ¨Women who seek to be equal with men lack ambition.¨ In all seriousness, I believe any executive position comes with challenges and it´s a matter of personality, rather than sex how one deals with those challenges.
I don’t compare myself to anyone, as no one is me, or goes through what I went through, or had my background, struggles, privileges etc. I guess we all owe it to ourselves to have a purpose in life and to use what we have to leave a legacy, create something.
I´ll be foolish not to use all that I have, as a man would use physical power in certain situations, let’s say, I’d use my wits or smile. That just proves you know how to work and take advantage of your differences rather than seeing them as a disadvantage.

How many content creators do you currently have signed in?
At the moment we’re doing this interview, at the end of August, the number of creators using our service is 103.

Was it difficult to redirect people’s attention to a new platform?
For sure it takes time, and myonly.chat has just started a few months ago. People were very curious and wanted to try it, to see how it works. We´re changing, adapting, improving every week, seeing what works and what doesn´t, while keeping our principles about what the creators should get from it. We don’t want to redirect them as in choosing a unique platform to be on; we encourage creators to sell their content and have their ¨eggs¨ in as many baskets as possible.

How hard is it to start your business in these uncertain times?
Starting a business is easy, everyone can do it. Keeping a business going and making it successful (this is different for everyone) is the tricky part. You have to be patient, passionate, and not too proud to ask for help. We make mistakes when we think we know
everything.

Tell us a few words about MyOnly.Chat’s CEO.
I get up every morning and I take a few moments to pray. I´m not a religious person by any means. Praying is my time of giving thanks to being awake and healthy, able to do what I love, have people that I love in my life, and being overall happy. This is not something that people know about me and I believe it’s the first time I’m talking about it in an interview.
My career in the adult industry started 6 years ago because I was stubborn to get into something I knew nothing about and learn about it. The reason why I accepted the MOC offer was that it was a challenge to learn more about something I didn’t know. This is myonly.chat´s CEO in a few words: grateful, curious and ambitious. Read more articles here

Tech & IT

PICO 4 Ultra Review: Sharp Standalone VR with Solid Passthrough

The PICO 4 Ultra is a fully standalone VR headset designed for immersive entertainment, high-resolution video playback, and mixed reality experiences. It improves on the original PICO 4 with stronger performance, sharper visuals and better overall balance.

The headset uses the Snapdragon XR2 Gen 2 chipset, putting it in the same performance class as the Meta Quest 3 and Quest 3S. It features 2160 x 2160 resolution per eye, a refresh rate of up to 90Hz, and support for 8192 x 4096 video decoding at 60 FPS, making it capable of handling high-resolution immersive video content.

Compared with the original PICO 4, the Ultra offers faster rendering, brighter visuals, and improved front-to-back weight distribution, which helps during longer sessions. It also ships with controllers, making it ready to use out of the box.

However, comfort is still an area where the PICO 4 Ultra falls slightly behind some competitors. Its rigid headband and stiff face pad can create more pressure during extended use, especially compared with the softer and more refined fit of the Quest 3 and Quest 3S.

Passthrough is one of the PICO 4 Ultra’s strengths. The headset provides a clean color view of nearby surroundings and offers a noticeable improvement over older VR devices. While it does not match the passthrough quality of Apple Vision Pro, it performs well for a standalone headset in its category.

The PICO 4 Ultra can be used with compatible VR apps from the PICO International Store, including media players, immersive video platforms, and mixed reality experiences. Browser-based access is also available for supported web content, giving users multiple ways to enjoy VR without needing a PC.

Overall, the PICO 4 Ultra is a strong standalone headset for users who want sharp visuals, good passthrough and solid performance. Its firmware and ergonomics may not feel as polished as Meta’s Quest lineup, but it remains a capable option for immersive entertainment right out of the box.

Cam Sites

Meta Quest 3 vs Quest 3S: Which VR Headset Is Better for Immersive Content?

Meta’s standalone Quest 3 and Quest 3S are two of the most popular VR headsets for users who want high-quality immersive entertainment without needing a PC or external tracking setup.

Both headsets share the same core chip and many of the same features, including 120Hz display support, Touch Plus controllers and hand tracking. The biggest difference is visual quality. The Quest 3 is the higher-end option, using sharper pancake lenses and offering a resolution of 2064 x 2208 pixels per eye. The Quest 3S is the more budget-friendly model, with 1832 x 1920 pixels per eye, making some compromises in display clarity to reach a lower price point.

For high-resolution video playback, both headsets are capable devices. They can handle 8192 x 4096 at 60 FPS, making them suitable for 8K immersive video when paired with compatible apps and properly encoded content. This makes either headset a strong option for users focused on detailed, wide-field VR experiences.

Both models also include Touch Plus controllers and support hand tracking, giving users different ways to navigate apps, menus, and media players. This flexibility makes the experience feel more natural, especially when switching between interactive content and video playback.

Passthrough is another important feature. The Quest 3 and Quest 3S use dual 4MP RGB cameras to provide color passthrough, allowing users to see their real-world surroundings while wearing the headset. The experience is useful and practical, though it does not match the sharpness and realism of Apple Vision Pro, which offers richer colors and more detailed environmental visuals.

Battery life remains a practical consideration. In continuous 8K streaming tests, the Quest 3 lasted about 120 minutes, while the Apple Vision Pro lasted about 150 minutes. Apple’s external battery has a larger capacity, but the runtime difference is smaller than the size gap might suggest.

For most users, the choice comes down to budget and image quality. The Quest 3 is the better pick for sharper visuals, clearer lenses, and a more premium viewing experience. The Quest 3S offers much of the same core performance at a lower price, making it a strong option for users who want modern VR features without paying for the highest display quality.

Overall, both headsets are reliable choices for immersive entertainment. Choose the Meta Quest 3 if visual clarity matters most, or the Quest 3S if you want a more affordable entry into standard

Tech & IT

“Bombs and Porn” Debate Highlights Growing AI Concerns

AI data center projects across the United States are facing delays, cancellations, and growing public opposition as concerns rise over energy use, pollution, taxes, and the overall impact of artificial intelligence.

Nearly half of the data center capacity planned for 2026 has reportedly already been delayed or canceled. Local communities and lawmakers are increasingly pushing back against large AI infrastructure projects, with some states introducing restrictions on new developments.

Critics continue to question whether AI is truly improving daily life. Instead, AI tools are frequently associated with fake content, misinformation, cheating in schools, and harmful online material. Concerns also grew after reports connected a suspect in the 2025 shooting at Florida State University to extensive conversations with an AI chatbot before the attack.

The debate also includes concerns about AI being used in military and surveillance operations. AI-powered systems are increasingly being adopted by defense and government agencies, raising ethical and privacy concerns.

Environmental impact remains another major issue. Massive AI data center projects are expected to increase electricity demand significantly, with some companies planning new gas-powered infrastructure to support future expansion. Critics warn this could lead to higher emissions and additional pressure on energy grids.

Public skepticism toward AI also remains high. Recent polls show that many Americans believe AI could negatively affect jobs, education, and everyday life, while large numbers oppose building AI data centers near their communities.

Critics argue that instead of focusing on futuristic promises about “superintelligence,” tech companies and politicians should better explain the practical benefits AI is currently providing to ordinary people.