The Supreme Court announced on Monday that it will decide if states can prohibit gender-affirming care for minors. This decision, expected next term, will affect laws in over two dozen states that restrict or criminalize transgender minors’ access to healthcare. The ruling will also determine if laws targeting transgender individuals are constitutionally questionable.
There is a chance the Supreme Court could surprise by mandating equality for trans Americans and their families. However, it seems more likely that the court will uphold bans on gender-affirming care for minors, potentially stripping constitutional protections from all transgender people across the country. This significant case marks the next civil rights showdown, coinciding with the second anniversary of Dobbs.
The case, U.S. v. Skrmetti, challenges a Tennessee law that prevents healthcare professionals from providing puberty blockers and hormone therapy to minors based on sex. These treatments, endorsed by leading medical associations, are essential for children with gender dysphoria. Tennessee’s ban is part of a wave of legislation by Republicans to enforce a narrow definition of gender, accompanied by laws banning drag performances and penalizing those who assist minors in obtaining gender-affirming care out of state.
Last year, transgender minors and their parents sued to block Tennessee’s healthcare ban, arguing it violates their 14th Amendment rights. The plaintiffs claimed the state ban infringes on parents’ right to make medical decisions for their children and discriminates against minors based on sex. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit rejected these claims by a 2–1 vote, stating the due process clause does not protect the right to gender-affirming care and the equal protection clause is not violated as the law does not constitute sex discrimination.
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the ACLU litigated this case, with the Supreme Court granting only the DOJ’s petition. The DOJ argued that Tennessee’s ban discriminates based on sex. The Supreme Court’s decision will address whether anti-trans discrimination constitutes sex discrimination under the 14th Amendment, requiring stringent justification for such laws.
A broad decision could affect not just gender-affirming care but also other laws limiting transgender rights in sports, public bathrooms, housing, education, and more. If the court rules that anti-trans laws trigger heightened scrutiny, these measures will be constitutionally suspect. A decision otherwise could uphold most discriminatory laws, erasing constitutional protections for transgender people.
There is cautious optimism based on the 2020 Bostock v. Clayton County ruling, where the Supreme Court found that discrimination against transgender individuals is based on sex. However, this case involved a statute, not the Constitution. While there is a possibility the court could extend Bostock’s reasoning, the current conservative majority may be reluctant to expand LGBTQ+ rights.
Both the DOJ and the ACLU urged the Supreme Court to take up Skrmetti as the last hope against the proliferation of restrictive laws. Despite the risks, they hope the court will recognize Tennessee’s law as sex-based discrimination. However, given the court’s conservative leanings, it is uncertain if they will protect the rights of transgender individuals.
Last Spots + International Guests: This Is Lalexpo 2026
The Lalexpo experience keeps growing! A new edition is coming, packed with high-level content, international guests, exclusive spaces, and activities designed to take the industry to the next level.
Ideas Without a Script: Conversations That Make an Impact
Ideas Without a Script is a space designed for real, unfiltered conversations with the people who are transforming the industry. A place where experiences, insights, and stories become inspiration.
In this first edition, the special guest will be Yeferson Cossio, one of the most influential content creators in Latin America, with millions of followers and a massive digital reach. Beyond his success on social media, he has established himself as an entrepreneur, developing high-level projects and collaborations.
A close and relaxed space to hear his stories, insights, and perspectives.
Limited spots available
Price: $84 USD
If you already have your Lalexpo ticket, you get 50% OFF
Or request more information through Lalexpo’s WhatsApp lines.
Special Guests: Global Talent at Lalexpo
This year, we will host some of the most influential names in the adult entertainment industry worldwide:
Johnny Sins – American actor, director, and content creator, recognized as one of the most popular male talents in the industry. With nearly two decades of experience and over 3,000 productions, he has been inducted into the AVN Hall of Fame and has become a global icon.
Lily Phillips – British actress and content creator who has gained notoriety through her presence on digital platforms and viral projects that have sparked global conversation.
Jason Luv – Actor, director, and producer from Houston, known for his versatility and strong global positioning. In 2026, he surpassed one billion views, reinforcing his impact on the industry.
Yusuf Gattouz – Algerian model known as Gattouz, who has quickly positioned himself among the most viewed male talents worldwide, with hundreds of millions of views.
Lalexpo Awards: Voting Is Now Open
The official Lalexpo Awards voting is now live.
You can now support your favorites by logging into your profile and participating in the selection of the winners.
Diva Traffic: Traffic Services Shut Down on February 20, 2026
Everything is changing in the camming industry. As a clear example, after years of being known as a traffic company—especially for promotion within the adult cams space—2026 is the year the industry says goodbye to Diva Traffic!
Behind this exit is an announcement posted by the company under the headline “Important Service Update.” Diva Traffic stated that effective February 20, 2026, it will discontinue its operations, including all traffic purchase services. The platform also noted that all previously purchased tokens must be used to activate traffic boost campaigns by that date, and that as of today, token purchases and subscriptions are no longer available.
The shutdown closes the chapter on a brand that, for some, was a useful promotional tool—and for others, a recurring source of controversy. Over time, countless rumors circulated across studios and among models, with many in the community alleging the service relied heavily on bots, fake clicks, and non-human traffic rather than real users.
Whatever side of the debate people were on, the outcome is now the same: a familiar name in cam-focused traffic services is exiting the scene, and studios and creators will need to rethink and adjust their promotion strategies moving forward.
Reclaim The Net: Arizona HB 2920 Would Expand Age Checks to Preinstalled Apps
Arizona lawmakers are weighing a sweeping app-store age-verification proposal that would apply not only to app downloads but also to core phone functions most users take for granted, according to Reclaim The Net.
The measure, House Bill 2920, was introduced on January 27, 2026, and is pending before the Arizona House Science & Technology Committee. As described, the bill would require age checks for app store accounts and would also cover preinstalled software and built-in tools such as the web browser, text messaging app, search bar, calculator, and weather widget, effectively placing nearly every piece of mobile software under age-gating requirements.
How HB 2920 would work
Under the proposal, app store providers would be required to determine each account holder’s age category using “commercially available” verification methods. The bill, as reported, does not precisely define what verification methods would qualify, and it assigns the Arizona Attorney General the role of setting rules for acceptable processes.
HB 2920 would divide users into four groups:
Under 13
Ages 13–16
Ages 16–18
Adults
For anyone under 18, the bill would require the minor’s account to be “affiliated” with a parent account and mandate “verifiable parental consent” before a minor could download or purchase an app or make in-app purchases. Reclaim The Net notes that this consent framework would also extend to preinstalled apps, meaning the first time a minor attempts to open certain default phone functions, the system could require parent approval before access is granted.
A key issue raised in the coverage is that the bill does not specify how parent-child relationships will be verified. Instead, app stores would have wide discretion to determine parenthood via unspecified “commercially reasonable” methods.
Updates could trigger new consent requests
The bill’s scope would extend beyond initial access and downloads. If a developer makes a “significant change” to an application, the proposal would require renewed parental consent before the minor can access the updated version.
In the Reclaim The Net description, “significant change” would include:
Privacy policy modifications
Changes to categories of data collected
Age rating changes
Adding in-app purchases
Introducing advertisements
That could mean routine software maintenance becomes a gatekeeping event. A weather app that adds a banner ad, for example, could require fresh parental approval. A note-taking app’s privacy policy update could also trigger a new consent prompt before a minor can keep using it.
To make this system function, developers would be required to notify app stores of “significant changes,” while app stores would need to notify parent accounts and secure renewed permission before restoring access.
Penalties and lawsuits
Reclaim The Net reports that HB 2920 would include civil penalties up to $75,000 per violation, alongside a private right of action allowing parents and minors to sue for $1,000 per violation, plus potential punitive damages. The piece argues these provisions could increase compliance pressure on both app stores and developers.
Because consent status would need to be tracked, app stores would have to collect and maintain records tied to age categories, parental affiliations, verification records, and consent histories, and share age-category data with developers during downloads, purchases, or app launches. While the bill includes language around “industry standard encryption” and limiting data use to compliance purposes, it would still require extensive data collection and transmission to operate as designed.
Comparisons to other states and legal scrutiny
The coverage points to Texas as a recent example of similar legislation. Reclaim The Net notes that a federal judge blocked Texas’ law before it took effect, describing it as comparable to requiring every bookstore to verify every customer’s age and to require parental consent for minors to enter and buy books. The ruling found the law likely unconstitutional, concluding that it imposed content-based restrictions and failed strict scrutiny.
Arizona’s HB 2920 is framed as part of a broader state-level push toward app-store age verification. Reclaim The Net lists Texas, Utah, Louisiana, and California as states that have passed versions of these measures, with different effective dates and enforcement approaches.
HB 2920 is described as going further than most by explicitly covering preinstalled applications, raising the possibility that a minor could purchase a phone and be unable to use built-in tools until a parent account is established and consent is granted.
Proposed effective date
Reclaim The Net reports that if HB 2920 advances through the legislature, it would take effect on November 30, 2026, setting a compliance timeline for app stores and developers.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login