Five families with transgender children, and three healthcare workers in Texas, are suing the state. They want to stop a new law that bans gender-affirming care for young people. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Texas and other legal groups started the lawsuit. The Texas state, its attorney general, and the state medical board are all named in the suit.
The law has not yet started, but it’s already causing problems for transgender youth and their families, says Brian Klosterboer from the ACLU of Texas. Some families have even moved out of Texas because of it.
The lawsuit says the new law goes against the state constitution. It stops parents from getting necessary medical care for their children. It also discriminates against transgender youth and limits the work doctors can do.
If the law starts on September 1st, things will get even worse, says Klosterboer. For example, a nine-year-old girl named Maeve will need medication to stop her body from becoming more like a boy’s. But if the law starts, she can’t get this medicine.
Another teenager, Nathan, also felt upset when he heard about the new law. His doctor stopped giving him the medicine he needed to feel like himself. He even had a medical appointment canceled because of the law.
Many people are angry about the new law. They have protested at the Texas state capitol. The police have used violence against peaceful protesters, says Klosterboer. Other states in America have also tried to ban gender-affirming care. But, most times, these bans have been stopped by lawsuits.
Klosterboer thinks all Texans should care about this law. He says, “The vast majority of Texans don’t want their government interfering with their private medical decisions.”
U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Mail Delivery of Abortion Pills in 7-2 Vote
The U.S. Supreme Court has rejected an anti-abortion challenge targeting federal rules that allow abortion pills to be prescribed online and delivered through the mail.
In a 7-2 decision, the court granted an emergency appeal from the makers of Mifepristone and blocked a ruling from the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in Louisiana that would have banned the mailing of the medication. Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr. dissented.
Justice Alito criticized the decision, arguing it undermined the court’s ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which returned abortion regulation authority to individual states.
The ruling represents a setback for abortion opponents who argue that abortion medication is unsafe. The case will now return to the 5th Circuit for further review.
Mifepristone was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2000 as a safe and effective medication for ending early pregnancies and treating miscarriages. It is commonly used together with misoprostol, a second drug that causes cramping.
Since 2016, the FDA has gradually eased restrictions on the medication. During the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021, the agency temporarily suspended the requirement for patients to obtain the pills directly from a clinic or doctor, before permanently removing the rule in 2023.
Medication abortions now account for nearly two-thirds of abortions in the United States, while telehealth services are used in approximately 27% of abortion cases nationwide.
The lawsuit was brought by Liz Murrill, who argued that allowing abortion pills to be mailed weakened Louisiana’s strict abortion ban. A federal judge initially delayed a final decision while the FDA conducted a separate review of the drug’s safety.
However, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals later ruled that the FDA had improperly relaxed its regulations, immediately reinstating restrictions on mailing the medication beginning May 1.
Abortion law experts described the appeals court decision as highly unusual, noting that courts rarely force the FDA to restore safety restrictions that the agency previously reviewed and deemed unnecessary.
Chaturbate: Health + Wellness Event Returns Sept 17
Chaturbate announces its fifth annual Health + Wellness Event for September 17, 2025, themed “New Age of Self-Care.” The site frames self-care as a strategy for creators—covering unplugging without losing income, eating better without guilt, and setting boundaries that stick—through candid talks with creators and experts. Attendees can ask questions live in the chat during each session.
Schedule (PDT) 10:00–10:45 AM — Rest is Radical: Sleep, Balance & the Burnout Epidemic Creators share strategies for downtime and prioritizing rest without sacrificing growth. Speakers: Raquel Savage (Therapist), VioletttFlowers (Chaturbate Creator), BlondeFoxSilverFox (Chaturbate Creator).
11:00–11:45 AM — Glow Up From the Inside Out: Nutrition, Movement & Sex-Positive Wellness How fueling your body and staying active can enhance confidence, libido, and overall well-being on—and off—camera. Speakers: Chris Boss (Registered Dietitian), SaraLoveRays (Chaturbate Creator), LailaGetsNaked (Chaturbate Creator), DCHCCO (Chaturbate Creator).
12:00–12:45 PM — Wellness on a Budget: Affordable Self-Care for Creators Small, sustainable habits and routines that don’t break the bank. Speakers: Dr. Shawn (Board-Certified Anesthesiologist), AdalineStar, AlphaZack14, TiffaniLove (Chaturbate Creators).
1:00–1:45 PM — Mind Over Media: Mental Health in the Age of Always Being “On” A candid discussion on anxiety, burnout, boundaries, therapy, and the pressures of always being online. Speakers: Romi Rain (Adult Industry Icon), Heatherbby (Chaturbate Creator).
Chaturbate invites creators to join the live sessions and engage with the panelists throughout the day. More details: chaturbate.com/healthandwellness.
Italy: Senate Passes Law Introducing Life Imprisonment for Femicide
In a historic move aimed at combating gender-based violence, the Italian Senate has unanimously passed a bill that formally enshrines femicide as a distinct criminal offense in the country’s Penal Code. With 161 votes in favor and none against, the legislation mandates life imprisonment for anyone found guilty of killing a woman out of gender-based hatred or with the intent to suppress her rights and freedoms.
According to Italy’s national press agency ANSA, cited by Agerpres, the law defines femicide as the act of murdering a woman “out of discrimination or hatred rooted in her gender, or with the goal of repressing her rights, freedoms, or identity.”
Beyond setting the maximum penalty, the bill also imposes tougher restrictions on access to prison benefits for femicide convicts and mandates new national programs focused on education and awareness to help prevent gender-based violence before it escalates.
The bill now moves to the Chamber of Deputies for final approval. Its introduction comes amid growing public outrage over the rise in femicide cases across Italy. In 2024 alone, official data from the Interior Ministry recorded 113 femicides, of which 99 occurred in family or intimate contexts. Tragically, 61 women were killed by current or former partners.
If adopted, Italy will join a small but growing number of countries that have codified femicide as a standalone crime—marking a pivotal moment in the nation’s efforts to protect women and address systemic violence rooted in misogyny.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login