Tech & IT

Meta Seeks Dismissal of User Safety Lawsuit

Intro:
Meta Platforms, including high-profile leaders like Mark Zuckerberg, is pushing for the dismissal of a lawsuit alleging neglect in protecting its users from human trafficking and child sexual exploitation. This case, unfolding in Delaware, pits investment fund plaintiffs against the social media behemoth, accusing it of failing to act against known abuses on Facebook and Instagram.

Highlights:

Meta requests dismissal of user protection lawsuit.
The case involves trafficking and exploitation on platforms.
Plaintiffs claim Meta ignored abuse for years.
Dispute over Meta’s potential reputational and financial damage.

Meta Platforms, along with several of its top brass, including the founder Mark Zuckerberg, is facing a legal challenge. A lawsuit filed by investment funds in Delaware accuses them of not taking adequate measures to safeguard users on their social media networks from human trafficking and child sexual exploitation. This lawsuit suggests that Meta’s directors and executives were well aware of such abuses on Facebook and Instagram yet did little to curb these activities.

Christine Mackintosh, representing the plaintiffs, voiced concerns during a court hearing, pointing out that despite being aware of the exploitation facilitated by their platforms, Meta’s leadership did not take significant steps to prevent it. In contrast, David Ross, representing Meta, argued for the dismissal of the lawsuit, asserting that the company hasn’t experienced the “corporate trauma” that Delaware law requires for such a case to proceed. Furthermore, he mentioned that the lawsuit leans heavily on hypothetical future damages rather than concrete harm.

Despite Meta’s stance, the plaintiffs argue that the company has already suffered tangible losses, such as a notable decline in share prices and a tarnished reputation, partly due to media coverage of the alleged abuses. They also highlight the considerable legal expenses incurred by Meta in related cases.

A significant point of contention is Meta’s argument that the lawsuit should be dismissed because the plaintiffs did not demand the board take corrective action before suing. The plaintiffs counter this by stating that making such a demand would have been pointless, as the board, influenced heavily by Zuckerberg, is unlikely to act against its interests.

Further complicating matters, Mackintosh pointed out that Meta’s board seemed to ignore numerous warnings that should have prompted action against such exploitation. Despite this, Andy Stone, a Meta spokesperson, stated the company has been actively fighting against such abuses for over a decade, cooperating with law enforcement to tackle the criminals involved.

The legal debate extends to whether Delaware’s laws on corporate director oversight apply not just to legal compliance but also to managing business risks associated with such ethical issues. The judge’s upcoming decision is eagerly awaited, signaling potential implications for how companies address significant social concerns.

Tech & IT

Apple rolls out UK age verification with iOS 26.4 after Meta and Google child safety fines

Apple has introduced age verification for iPhone and iPad users in the UK with iOS 26.4 and iPadOS 26.4, adding a new layer of checks for accounts that require confirmation that the user is 18 or older.

According to the report, UK users may now be asked to verify their age by adding a credit card or scanning an ID, unless Apple has already confirmed that information. Apple says the process is required by law in some countries and regions for actions tied to an Apple Account, including downloading apps, changing certain settings, or accessing specific features. When verification is needed, a prompt appears in the Settings menu.

The rollout comes at a time when child safety rules are tightening across the UK. While current UK law does not specifically require device-level age verification, adult websites, including pornography platforms, are already expected to carry out age checks. That has led to wider discussion about whether verification should also happen at the device level, rather than only on individual sites.

The timing is especially notable because it follows a major child safety case involving Meta and Google. The companies were reportedly ordered to pay $6 million after a lawsuit in Los Angeles claimed that platforms including Facebook, WhatsApp, and YouTube had a serious impact on a young woman’s mental health.

Apple’s move may also reflect broader regulatory pressure. The UK government is reportedly considering stronger restrictions for under-16s on social media, similar to measures seen in Australia. Reports also indicate Apple has been working with Ofcom as these safety tools develop.

For users who cannot verify an adult identity, Apple suggests that some features may be limited or that the account may need to be placed under Family Sharing with a parent or guardian. The exact restrictions could vary depending on the situation.

Tech & IT

Australia Age Checks Now Required for Porn Access

Australia has begun enforcing stricter age-verification rules for online adult content, requiring platforms to take meaningful steps to stop under-18s from accessing pornography and other age-restricted material. The Age-Restricted Material Codes for services including social media, relevant electronic services, equipment providers, and designated internet services came into effect on March 9, 2026.

Under the new framework, some services may now require proof of age before allowing access to legal adult content. Australia’s eSafety Commissioner says the accepted methods can vary by platform, but any age-assurance process must be accurate, reliable, and compliant with Australian privacy law. eSafety has said the changes are intended to reduce children’s exposure to pornography, high-impact violence, and other harmful age-inappropriate material online.

The rollout has already affected access to some major adult platforms in Australia, while debate continues over privacy risks and how effective the rules will be in practice. Recent reporting has also linked the changes to rising interest in VPN services as some users look for ways around the restrictions.

Tech & IT

Apple: Age-Verification Tools Expand Worldwide With New 18+ Download Blocks

Apple is expanding its age-verification system in more countries to match stricter child-protection laws. The changes mainly affect how people download 18+ (adult-rated) apps and how developers confirm whether a user is a minor or an adult—without collecting sensitive personal details.

What’s changing for users

New 18+ download blocks: In Brazil, Australia, and Singapore, users must confirm they are 18 or older before downloading apps rated 18+.
Less access for minors to adult content: This is meant to stop children from downloading adult-only apps through the App Store.

What’s changing for developers

Declared Age Range API (updated): Apple is updating an API that lets apps know only an age category (example: minor vs adult), not the person’s exact age.
- Developers do not receive private data, such as date of birth.
- The app receives a simple “category signal” to follow local rules.
Parental control options: For child accounts, parents/guardians can choose whether to share age information and whether permission is required in certain situations.

Loot boxes and “gambling-like” features

Apple is also targeting apps with features regulators often consider risky for minors, such as loot boxes.

In Brazil, if an app includes loot boxes, Apple may automatically rate it 18+.
That means minors can’t download it, because the App Store will treat it as adult-only.

U.S. states: Utah and Louisiana

Apple is adding tools to help apps comply with state-level child safety laws:

In Utah and Louisiana, Apple can share a new user’s age category with developers.
The system can also flag when parental permission is required, including for major app updates.

Why Apple says it’s doing this

Apple’s message is: protect kids + respect privacy.

The App Store handles most of the verification.
Apps get only a yes/no type age signal (minor/adult), not personal identity details.
The goal is to comply with various laws without forcing developers to collect sensitive data.

If you want, paste the original version you want to keep, word-for-word, and I’ll rewrite it just as clear while keeping the same word count.