In a perplexing legal standoff, lawyers for X (formerly Twitter) are blocking access to crucial account information for Rina Oh Amen, an artist and alleged victim of Jeffrey Epstein. Despite repeated subpoenas, the social media giant has refused to comply, hindering ongoing legal proceedings between Oh Amen and Virginia Giuffre, another well-known Epstein victim. This refusal has baffled both parties’ lawyers and delayed the case’s resolution.
In an unusual twist, the social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter, is refusing to release account data for Rina Oh Amen, an artist and alleged victim of Jeffrey Epstein. Oh Amen’s lawyers have been seeking access to her locked-out accounts as part of ongoing legal disputes involving Virginia Giuffre, another prominent Epstein victim. Despite these subpoenas being issued at Oh Amen’s request, X’s legal team has not complied, advising instead that the plaintiff herself should provide the information — a request that has left many puzzled, given her locked-out status.
The backdrop to this situation involves a complex legal exchange between Oh Amen and Giuffre. On social media, Giuffre accused Oh Amen of fabricating her victimhood to access funds designated for Epstein’s real victims, recruiting other girls for Epstein’s trafficking ring, and physically harming her. In retaliation, Oh Amen filed a defamation lawsuit against Giuffre, who countersued with allegations of sexual assault. Oh Amen then launched a countersuit, accusing Giuffre of similar misconduct.
While these legal entanglements continue, lawyers for both parties have cooperated in other aspects of the case, sharing documents and moving toward discovery. However, the stalemate over the X account data has become a significant stumbling block. Oh Amen’s attorney, Alexander Dudelson, expressed frustration, stating, “If they complied, ultimately, I could set a trial date and resolve this matter. This is preventing us from pushing forward right now.”
Giuffre’s legal team also finds X’s stance baffling. Kathleen R. Thomas, Giuffre’s lawyer, questioned why Oh Amen couldn’t access her own information, saying, “The plaintiff is doing the right thing.” Thomas has since requested judicial intervention to compel X to comply with the subpoenas, though this process is expected to delay the case further.
When Business Insider contacted X for a comment, they received an automated response stating that the company was “busy.” The unexplained obstruction from X has left both parties’ lawyers at a loss, with Thomas remarking, “I don’t know why they were so obstructionist about this subpoena. It’s baffling to me.”
The situation underscores the complexities and frustrations inherent in navigating legal disputes in the digital age, especially when crucial evidence is locked behind tech company policies. As the case drags on, the involved parties and their representatives are left in limbo, awaiting the release of information that could significantly impact the lawsuit’s outcome.
Apple: Age-Verification Tools Expand Worldwide With New 18+ Download Blocks
Apple is expanding its age-verification system in more countries to match stricter child-protection laws. The changes mainly affect how people download 18+ (adult-rated) apps and how developers confirm whether a user is a minor or an adult—without collecting sensitive personal details.
What’s changing for users
New 18+ download blocks: In Brazil, Australia, and Singapore, users must confirm they are 18 or older before downloading apps rated 18+.
Less access for minors to adult content: This is meant to stop children from downloading adult-only apps through the App Store.
What’s changing for developers
Declared Age Range API (updated): Apple is updating an API that lets apps know only an age category (example: minor vs adult), not the person’s exact age.
Developers do not receive private data, such asdate of birth.
The app receives a simple “category signal” to follow local rules.
Parental control options: For child accounts, parents/guardians can choose whether to share age information and whether permission is required in certain situations.
Loot boxes and “gambling-like” features
Apple is also targeting apps with features regulators often consider risky for minors, such as loot boxes.
In Brazil, if an app includes loot boxes, Apple may automatically rate it 18+.
That means minors can’t download it, because the App Store will treat it as adult-only.
U.S. states: Utah and Louisiana
Apple is adding tools to help apps comply with state-level child safety laws:
In Utah and Louisiana, Apple can share a new user’s age category with developers.
The system can also flag when parental permission is required, including for major app updates.
Why Apple says it’s doing this
Apple’s message is: protect kids + respect privacy.
The App Store handles most of the verification.
Apps get only a yes/no type age signal (minor/adult), not personal identity details.
The goal is to comply with various laws without forcing developers to collect sensitive data.
If you want, paste the original version you want to keep, word-for-word, and I’ll rewrite it just as clear while keeping the same word count.
Diva Traffic: Traffic Services Shut Down on February 20, 2026
Everything is changing in the camming industry. As a clear example, after years of being known as a traffic company—especially for promotion within the adult cams space—2026 is the year the industry says goodbye to Diva Traffic!
Behind this exit is an announcement posted by the company under the headline “Important Service Update.” Diva Traffic stated that effective February 20, 2026, it will discontinue its operations, including all traffic purchase services. The platform also noted that all previously purchased tokens must be used to activate traffic boost campaigns by that date, and that as of today, token purchases and subscriptions are no longer available.
The shutdown closes the chapter on a brand that, for some, was a useful promotional tool—and for others, a recurring source of controversy. Over time, countless rumors circulated across studios and among models, with many in the community alleging the service relied heavily on bots, fake clicks, and non-human traffic rather than real users.
Whatever side of the debate people were on, the outcome is now the same: a familiar name in cam-focused traffic services is exiting the scene, and studios and creators will need to rethink and adjust their promotion strategies moving forward.
Forbes: TeamSpeak Adds Capacity After Discord Age-Verification Rollout
TeamSpeak, a voice chat service popular with gamers, is seeing a spike in sign-ups after Discord announced it will require age verification for some users, Forbes reported. The influx has strained TeamSpeak’s infrastructure across multiple regions, including the United States, as users seek alternatives following Discord’s recent update.
In a Feb. 16 update cited by Forbes, TeamSpeak said it added new hosting regions in Frankfurt and Toronto and is expanding capacity in response to an “incredible surge of new users.” TeamSpeak noted that the additional regions are designed to spread demand across more infrastructure rather than restrict where people can connect from, meaning U.S.-based users can still join communities hosted outside the country.
Founded in 2001, TeamSpeak has positioned itself as a privacy-focused alternative to Discord, emphasizing letting communities create and manage their own servers. That approach gives server owners more direct control over hosting choices, moderation policies and how data is handled.
TeamSpeak built its reputation well before Discord’s rise, becoming a staple in PC gaming communities where stable voice communication matters for coordination. The service has been widely used by groups playing multiplayer titles such as World of Warcraft and Overwatch, where clear, low-latency voice chat can be central to team play.
Online forums and gaming communities have reported renewed interest in TeamSpeak since Discord’s age-verification announcement, with some users urging friends and groups to migrate or set up fresh servers. Forbes said it contacted TeamSpeak for additional details on the jump in new users and was awaiting a response.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login