Tech & IT

AI’s Dark Side: Consequences of Human Greed

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a subject of concern regarding its potential negative consequences. However, it is important to acknowledge that if AI leads to our downfall, it will be due to human greed and stupidity rather than the technology itself.

Generative AI requires vast amounts of training data, which is typically created by humans who receive no compensation for their contributions. Moreover, many business models in the AI space directly compete with human creators, exacerbating the problem.

The training data used for generative AI is often sourced from the internet without proper authorization or compensation. This has resulted in several class action lawsuits against companies in the AI industry, with allegations of copyright infringement. Instances of stolen human work have also come to light, such as an AI writing assistant using a fanfiction sex trope without proper attribution.

One of the prominent concerns surrounding generative AI is its potential to replace human creators. Media outlets like Buzzfeed and Men’s Journal have already begun utilizing AI-generated articles, indicating a shift toward automation in content creation. The monetization of writing and creative work relies on various factors like book sales, subscriptions, advertising, and more. However, the business perspective often sees writing as mere content units, while writers value their craft. This disconnect has led to a writers strike as a response to the increasing threat of AI replacing human writers.

The content units mindset prevalent in business circles drives the inevitability of AI taking over human roles. When the focus is solely on generating more content units at a lower cost, all creatives become susceptible to being replaced by AI. This results in a self-defeating cycle, where the very work of writers and creators is used to forge the sword that will eliminate their jobs.

While the concerns of human writers on strike have gained attention, the human cost of building AI often goes unnoticed. Data labeling teams, like the one highlighted in a Big Technology article, play a crucial role in training AI systems. However, they are often underpaid, such as the case of Richard Mathenge and his colleagues who were paid only $1 per hour for their work on ChatGPT.

Predatory practices have also emerged in the AI space. Grief Tech, which claims to help people cope with the loss of a loved one, exploits emotionally vulnerable individuals, akin to traditional frauds like séances. AI-powered impersonation scams have also become more sophisticated, with scammers using AI-generated voices or voice changers to deceive victims. These scams have resulted in substantial financial losses and emotional distress for many individuals.

Impersonating celebrities or public figures through AI-generated content has also become disturbingly easy. Scammers exploit digital ads featuring celebrities, impersonate public figures for fraudulent purposes, and even create deepfake content without authorization.

The technology behind AI is already in use and has unleashed a Pandora’s box of potential consequences. Calls for AI regulation, while necessary, cannot undo the impact already felt. It is crucial to address human greed and ignorance to ensure the responsible and ethical use of AI technology.

Source: MasonPelt.com

Tech & IT

“Bombs and Porn” Debate Highlights Growing AI Concerns

AI data center projects across the United States are facing delays, cancellations, and growing public opposition as concerns rise over energy use, pollution, taxes, and the overall impact of artificial intelligence.

Nearly half of the data center capacity planned for 2026 has reportedly already been delayed or canceled. Local communities and lawmakers are increasingly pushing back against large AI infrastructure projects, with some states introducing restrictions on new developments.

Critics continue to question whether AI is truly improving daily life. Instead, AI tools are frequently associated with fake content, misinformation, cheating in schools, and harmful online material. Concerns also grew after reports connected a suspect in the 2025 shooting at Florida State University to extensive conversations with an AI chatbot before the attack.

The debate also includes concerns about AI being used in military and surveillance operations. AI-powered systems are increasingly being adopted by defense and government agencies, raising ethical and privacy concerns.

Environmental impact remains another major issue. Massive AI data center projects are expected to increase electricity demand significantly, with some companies planning new gas-powered infrastructure to support future expansion. Critics warn this could lead to higher emissions and additional pressure on energy grids.

Public skepticism toward AI also remains high. Recent polls show that many Americans believe AI could negatively affect jobs, education, and everyday life, while large numbers oppose building AI data centers near their communities.

Critics argue that instead of focusing on futuristic promises about “superintelligence,” tech companies and politicians should better explain the practical benefits AI is currently providing to ordinary people.

Tech & IT

Apple rolls out UK age verification with iOS 26.4 after Meta and Google child safety fines

Apple has introduced age verification for iPhone and iPad users in the UK with iOS 26.4 and iPadOS 26.4, adding a new layer of checks for accounts that require confirmation that the user is 18 or older.

According to the report, UK users may now be asked to verify their age by adding a credit card or scanning an ID, unless Apple has already confirmed that information. Apple says the process is required by law in some countries and regions for actions tied to an Apple Account, including downloading apps, changing certain settings, or accessing specific features. When verification is needed, a prompt appears in the Settings menu.

The rollout comes at a time when child safety rules are tightening across the UK. While current UK law does not specifically require device-level age verification, adult websites, including pornography platforms, are already expected to carry out age checks. That has led to wider discussion about whether verification should also happen at the device level, rather than only on individual sites.

The timing is especially notable because it follows a major child safety case involving Meta and Google. The companies were reportedly ordered to pay $6 million after a lawsuit in Los Angeles claimed that platforms including Facebook, WhatsApp, and YouTube had a serious impact on a young woman’s mental health.

Apple’s move may also reflect broader regulatory pressure. The UK government is reportedly considering stronger restrictions for under-16s on social media, similar to measures seen in Australia. Reports also indicate Apple has been working with Ofcom as these safety tools develop.

For users who cannot verify an adult identity, Apple suggests that some features may be limited or that the account may need to be placed under Family Sharing with a parent or guardian. The exact restrictions could vary depending on the situation.

Tech & IT

Australia Age Checks Now Required for Porn Access

Australia has begun enforcing stricter age-verification rules for online adult content, requiring platforms to take meaningful steps to stop under-18s from accessing pornography and other age-restricted material. The Age-Restricted Material Codes for services including social media, relevant electronic services, equipment providers, and designated internet services came into effect on March 9, 2026.

Under the new framework, some services may now require proof of age before allowing access to legal adult content. Australia’s eSafety Commissioner says the accepted methods can vary by platform, but any age-assurance process must be accurate, reliable, and compliant with Australian privacy law. eSafety has said the changes are intended to reduce children’s exposure to pornography, high-impact violence, and other harmful age-inappropriate material online.

The rollout has already affected access to some major adult platforms in Australia, while debate continues over privacy risks and how effective the rules will be in practice. Recent reporting has also linked the changes to rising interest in VPN services as some users look for ways around the restrictions.