Tech & IT
AI’s Dark Side: Consequences of Human Greed
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a subject of concern regarding its potential negative consequences. However, it is important to acknowledge that if AI leads to our downfall, it will be due to human greed and stupidity rather than the technology itself.
Generative AI requires vast amounts of training data, which is typically created by humans who receive no compensation for their contributions. Moreover, many business models in the AI space directly compete with human creators, exacerbating the problem.
The training data used for generative AI is often sourced from the internet without proper authorization or compensation. This has resulted in several class action lawsuits against companies in the AI industry, with allegations of copyright infringement. Instances of stolen human work have also come to light, such as an AI writing assistant using a fanfiction sex trope without proper attribution.
One of the prominent concerns surrounding generative AI is its potential to replace human creators. Media outlets like Buzzfeed and Men’s Journal have already begun utilizing AI-generated articles, indicating a shift toward automation in content creation. The monetization of writing and creative work relies on various factors like book sales, subscriptions, advertising, and more. However, the business perspective often sees writing as mere content units, while writers value their craft. This disconnect has led to a writers strike as a response to the increasing threat of AI replacing human writers.
The content units mindset prevalent in business circles drives the inevitability of AI taking over human roles. When the focus is solely on generating more content units at a lower cost, all creatives become susceptible to being replaced by AI. This results in a self-defeating cycle, where the very work of writers and creators is used to forge the sword that will eliminate their jobs.
While the concerns of human writers on strike have gained attention, the human cost of building AI often goes unnoticed. Data labeling teams, like the one highlighted in a Big Technology article, play a crucial role in training AI systems. However, they are often underpaid, such as the case of Richard Mathenge and his colleagues who were paid only $1 per hour for their work on ChatGPT.
Predatory practices have also emerged in the AI space. Grief Tech, which claims to help people cope with the loss of a loved one, exploits emotionally vulnerable individuals, akin to traditional frauds like séances. AI-powered impersonation scams have also become more sophisticated, with scammers using AI-generated voices or voice changers to deceive victims. These scams have resulted in substantial financial losses and emotional distress for many individuals.
Impersonating celebrities or public figures through AI-generated content has also become disturbingly easy. Scammers exploit digital ads featuring celebrities, impersonate public figures for fraudulent purposes, and even create deepfake content without authorization.
The technology behind AI is already in use and has unleashed a Pandora’s box of potential consequences. Calls for AI regulation, while necessary, cannot undo the impact already felt. It is crucial to address human greed and ignorance to ensure the responsible and ethical use of AI technology.
Source: MasonPelt.com
Tech & IT
Chess Controversy: Niemann Denies Using Vibrating Anal Beads to Cheat
The $100million (£79million) defamation lawsuit was settled in August.
American chess grandmaster Hans Niemann vehemently denied allegations that he utilized a vibrating device to gain an unfair advantage during tournaments. In a recent appearance on “Piers Morgan Uncensored”, Niemann addressed the specific rumor circulating on social media that he had used vibrating anal beads to cheat in chess matches.
This controversy gained traction following Niemann’s win against former World Champion Magnus Carlsen in the Sinquefield Cup’s third round in St. Louis, Missouri, on September 5, 2022. Soon after the match, Carlsen unexpectedly left the tournament.
Following his victory, Niemann was suspended by Chess.COM due to cheating accusations. Although he admitted to employing a computer for assistance twice in his younger years, he firmly denied any malpractice in over-the-board (face-to-face) chess games.
Amidst these accusations, Niemann pursued legal action against several parties, including Carlsen, Chess.com, and grandmaster Hikaru Nakamura. As of August 28, a $100 million defamation lawsuit was settled in Niemann’s favor, resulting in the reinstatement of his Chess.COM account and permission to join future events.
In the interview with Morgan, Niemann was directly questioned about the specific device alleged to be involved in the cheating scandal. Niemann responded by expressing concern about the nature of the inquiry but firmly stated, “No, categorically, no.” He further emphasized his commitment to the integrity of the game, stating he’d willingly play under any stringent conditions, even suggesting he would “strip fully naked” or play in an environment with “zero electronic transmission” to prove his sincerity.
Source: CNN
Tech & IT
Congressman Seeks DOJ Action on AI-Generated Child Abuse Materials
Congressman Bob Good, backed by 29 fellow members of Congress, has urged the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to detail its strategy against the alarming rise of AI-generated child sexual abuse materials (CSAM).
In his letter dated Sept. 14 to U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland, Good highlighted initial reports from 2019 showing AI’s capability to produce explicit images of minors. He has requested a response from Garland by Oct. 13.
Good expressed the necessity for the attorney general to not only investigate and prosecute these cases but also identify if there are legislative gaps hindering action. Despite these AI-generated images being illegal, no known prosecutions have occurred.
A poll from a dark-web forum, reported by The Washington Post, revealed about 80% of participants had used or planned to use AI for creating CSAM. Additionally, a BBC investigation cited instances of AI-generated explicit images of children being sold on Patreon.
Good emphasized that while AI offers numerous positive applications, there are growing apprehensions about its misuse. Every state’s attorneys general echoed this sentiment in a bipartisan letter earlier in September, highlighting the urgent need to address AI’s potential to exploit children.
In his inquiry to the DOJ, Good posed six pivotal questions, particularly focusing on whether the department possesses the necessary legal and resource capabilities to counteract AI-created CSAM.
Law enforcement’s challenge intensifies with the advent of these materials, as it complicates victim identification and necessitates discerning between real and AI-generated images.
Good commented on the gravity of the issue, noting its potential to escalate further. The DOJ has yet to reply.
For further details, contact:
Jason Armesto, ja******@da***********.com.
Tech & IT
Microsoft Faces Gender Transition Discrimination Suit
Cassandra Granade has filed a lawsuit against Microsoft Corporation, alleging the tech giant created and sustained a hostile workplace environment towards her during her gender transition. The suit claims Microsoft eventually dismissed her in retaliation for her raising concerns.
Details of the Case:
Location: The lawsuit was lodged in the Superior Court for the State of Washington.
Background: Granade, a former senior software development engineer at Microsoft, alleges the company fostered an “offensively hostile work environment against LGBTQ+ employees.”
Specifics: Granade claims she was subjected to consistent bullying and harassment due to her gender transition. Despite reporting such issues as early as 2018, she states no remedial actions were taken.
Retaliation: After making repeated complaints, Granade says she received an “unjust and biased performance review in 2022,” diverging from Microsoft’s standard protocols. This purportedly prompted her to take a mental health break. Granade further alleges that Microsoft terminated her employment unlawfully while she was vacationing in October 2022 based on her sex, gender identity, and sexual orientation.
Legal Claims: The lawsuit contends that Granade has incurred significant economic losses due to Microsoft’s alleged discriminatory conduct. She accuses Microsoft of infringing the Washington Law Against Discrimination and is seeking a jury trial and compensatory damages.
The legal team representing the plaintiff comprises Jordan A. Taren and Robin J. Shishido of Shishido Taren Goldsworthy PLLC.
In a separate, unrelated development, an investor from Activision Blizzard sued the gaming company in November 2022. The suit claims that the proposed merger between Activision Blizzard and Microsoft adversely affected investors. This merger was allegedly expedited to safeguard Activision CEO Robert Kotick’s reputation following harassment and discrimination controversies.
Have you experienced discrimination at work due to your sex, gender identity, or sexual orientation? Share your experiences below.
The case in reference is Granade v. Microsoft Corporation, Case No. 23-2-17623-5 SEA.
Source: https://topclassactions.com/
Tech & IT
AI’s Dark Side: Consequences of Human Greed
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a subject of concern regarding its potential negative consequences. However, it is important to acknowledge that if AI leads to our downfall, it will be due to human greed and stupidity rather than the technology itself.
Generative AI requires vast amounts of training data, which is typically created by humans who receive no compensation for their contributions. Moreover, many business models in the AI space directly compete with human creators, exacerbating the problem.
The training data used for generative AI is often sourced from the internet without proper authorization or compensation. This has resulted in several class action lawsuits against companies in the AI industry, with allegations of copyright infringement. Instances of stolen human work have also come to light, such as an AI writing assistant using a fanfiction sex trope without proper attribution.
One of the prominent concerns surrounding generative AI is its potential to replace human creators. Media outlets like Buzzfeed and Men’s Journal have already begun utilizing AI-generated articles, indicating a shift toward automation in content creation. The monetization of writing and creative work relies on various factors like book sales, subscriptions, advertising, and more. However, the business perspective often sees writing as mere content units, while writers value their craft. This disconnect has led to a writers strike as a response to the increasing threat of AI replacing human writers.
The content units mindset prevalent in business circles drives the inevitability of AI taking over human roles. When the focus is solely on generating more content units at a lower cost, all creatives become susceptible to being replaced by AI. This results in a self-defeating cycle, where the very work of writers and creators is used to forge the sword that will eliminate their jobs.
While the concerns of human writers on strike have gained attention, the human cost of building AI often goes unnoticed. Data labeling teams, like the one highlighted in a Big Technology article, play a crucial role in training AI systems. However, they are often underpaid, such as the case of Richard Mathenge and his colleagues who were paid only $1 per hour for their work on ChatGPT.
Predatory practices have also emerged in the AI space. Grief Tech, which claims to help people cope with the loss of a loved one, exploits emotionally vulnerable individuals, akin to traditional frauds like séances. AI-powered impersonation scams have also become more sophisticated, with scammers using AI-generated voices or voice changers to deceive victims. These scams have resulted in substantial financial losses and emotional distress for many individuals.
Impersonating celebrities or public figures through AI-generated content has also become disturbingly easy. Scammers exploit digital ads featuring celebrities, impersonate public figures for fraudulent purposes, and even create deepfake content without authorization.
The technology behind AI is already in use and has unleashed a Pandora’s box of potential consequences. Calls for AI regulation, while necessary, cannot undo the impact already felt. It is crucial to address human greed and ignorance to ensure the responsible and ethical use of AI technology.
Source: MasonPelt.com
Warning: Undefined variable $user_ID in /home/bcamsmagazine/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/comments.php on line 49
You must be logged in to post a comment Login
This site uses User Verification plugin to reduce spam. See how your comment data is processed.Tech & IT
Chess Controversy: Niemann Denies Using Vibrating Anal Beads to Cheat
The $100million (£79million) defamation lawsuit was settled in August.
American chess grandmaster Hans Niemann vehemently denied allegations that he utilized a vibrating device to gain an unfair advantage during tournaments. In a recent appearance on “Piers Morgan Uncensored”, Niemann addressed the specific rumor circulating on social media that he had used vibrating anal beads to cheat in chess matches.
This controversy gained traction following Niemann’s win against former World Champion Magnus Carlsen in the Sinquefield Cup’s third round in St. Louis, Missouri, on September 5, 2022. Soon after the match, Carlsen unexpectedly left the tournament.
Following his victory, Niemann was suspended by Chess.COM due to cheating accusations. Although he admitted to employing a computer for assistance twice in his younger years, he firmly denied any malpractice in over-the-board (face-to-face) chess games.
Amidst these accusations, Niemann pursued legal action against several parties, including Carlsen, Chess.com, and grandmaster Hikaru Nakamura. As of August 28, a $100 million defamation lawsuit was settled in Niemann’s favor, resulting in the reinstatement of his Chess.COM account and permission to join future events.
In the interview with Morgan, Niemann was directly questioned about the specific device alleged to be involved in the cheating scandal. Niemann responded by expressing concern about the nature of the inquiry but firmly stated, “No, categorically, no.” He further emphasized his commitment to the integrity of the game, stating he’d willingly play under any stringent conditions, even suggesting he would “strip fully naked” or play in an environment with “zero electronic transmission” to prove his sincerity.
Source: CNN
Tech & IT
Congressman Seeks DOJ Action on AI-Generated Child Abuse Materials
Congressman Bob Good, backed by 29 fellow members of Congress, has urged the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to detail its strategy against the alarming rise of AI-generated child sexual abuse materials (CSAM).
In his letter dated Sept. 14 to U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland, Good highlighted initial reports from 2019 showing AI’s capability to produce explicit images of minors. He has requested a response from Garland by Oct. 13.
Good expressed the necessity for the attorney general to not only investigate and prosecute these cases but also identify if there are legislative gaps hindering action. Despite these AI-generated images being illegal, no known prosecutions have occurred.
A poll from a dark-web forum, reported by The Washington Post, revealed about 80% of participants had used or planned to use AI for creating CSAM. Additionally, a BBC investigation cited instances of AI-generated explicit images of children being sold on Patreon.
Good emphasized that while AI offers numerous positive applications, there are growing apprehensions about its misuse. Every state’s attorneys general echoed this sentiment in a bipartisan letter earlier in September, highlighting the urgent need to address AI’s potential to exploit children.
In his inquiry to the DOJ, Good posed six pivotal questions, particularly focusing on whether the department possesses the necessary legal and resource capabilities to counteract AI-created CSAM.
Law enforcement’s challenge intensifies with the advent of these materials, as it complicates victim identification and necessitates discerning between real and AI-generated images.
Good commented on the gravity of the issue, noting its potential to escalate further. The DOJ has yet to reply.
For further details, contact:
Jason Armesto, ja******@da***********.com.
Tech & IT
Microsoft Faces Gender Transition Discrimination Suit
Cassandra Granade has filed a lawsuit against Microsoft Corporation, alleging the tech giant created and sustained a hostile workplace environment towards her during her gender transition. The suit claims Microsoft eventually dismissed her in retaliation for her raising concerns.
Details of the Case:
Location: The lawsuit was lodged in the Superior Court for the State of Washington.
Background: Granade, a former senior software development engineer at Microsoft, alleges the company fostered an “offensively hostile work environment against LGBTQ+ employees.”
Specifics: Granade claims she was subjected to consistent bullying and harassment due to her gender transition. Despite reporting such issues as early as 2018, she states no remedial actions were taken.
Retaliation: After making repeated complaints, Granade says she received an “unjust and biased performance review in 2022,” diverging from Microsoft’s standard protocols. This purportedly prompted her to take a mental health break. Granade further alleges that Microsoft terminated her employment unlawfully while she was vacationing in October 2022 based on her sex, gender identity, and sexual orientation.
Legal Claims: The lawsuit contends that Granade has incurred significant economic losses due to Microsoft’s alleged discriminatory conduct. She accuses Microsoft of infringing the Washington Law Against Discrimination and is seeking a jury trial and compensatory damages.
The legal team representing the plaintiff comprises Jordan A. Taren and Robin J. Shishido of Shishido Taren Goldsworthy PLLC.
In a separate, unrelated development, an investor from Activision Blizzard sued the gaming company in November 2022. The suit claims that the proposed merger between Activision Blizzard and Microsoft adversely affected investors. This merger was allegedly expedited to safeguard Activision CEO Robert Kotick’s reputation following harassment and discrimination controversies.
Have you experienced discrimination at work due to your sex, gender identity, or sexual orientation? Share your experiences below.
The case in reference is Granade v. Microsoft Corporation, Case No. 23-2-17623-5 SEA.
Source: https://topclassactions.com/
Warning: Undefined variable $user_ID in /home/bcamsmagazine/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/comments.php on line 49
You must be logged in to post a comment Login
This site uses User Verification plugin to reduce spam. See how your comment data is processed.