>Survey Reveals: 3 out of 4 Teens Have Been Exposed to Online Pornography by Age 13 - BCAMS MAGAZINE
Connect with us

Selfcare & Sexual Wellness

Survey Reveals: 3 out of 4 Teens Have Been Exposed to Online Pornography by Age 13

A survey from Common Sense Media, a nonprofit child advocacy organization, has revealed that most teenagers have been exposed to online pornography by the age of 13, with 12 being the average age of first consumption.

Of over 1,300 teens between 13 and 17 surveyed, 73 percent reported having seen explicit content, 44 percent have done so intentionally, and 58 percent accidentally. As the proliferation of pornographic material on the internet has made it easier for youth and teens to consume, certain states have taken action to protect children from the dangers of online pornography. For example, Louisiana now requires those looking to view pornographic websites to present a government-issued ID.

The survey also found that LGBTQ+ youth are more likely than their peers to consume pornography, with many citing it as a way to explore their sexuality. Additionally, most respondents feel “OK” about the amount of pornography they consume, but half of them expressed feelings of guilt or shame afterward.

Overall, the survey highlights the need for greater education on the potential dangers of online pornography. Those viewing the content may be too young to understand, potentially leading to poor mental health, sexual violence, or other negative outcomes. In addition, older teens who consume pornography may have unrealistic or dangerous expectations of healthy sexual relationships.


Selfcare & Sexual Wellness

Wells Fargo Faces Lawsuit for Sexist Practices

Wells Fargo was accused of sex discrimination in a lawsuit by a bond saleswoman who said that the fourth-largest U.S. bank denied pay and promotions available to men and also tolerated “unapologetically sexist” in the workplace.

The complaint was filed in federal court on Friday in Chicago by Michal Leavitt of the long accusing large U.S. banks of bias against women. Leavitt said that Wells Fargo’s practice of is noted for steering larger accounts virtually exclusively toward men in its financial institutions organizations group cost her up to a third of her potential pay.

Moreover, it forced her to wait nine years to receive a promotion from vice president to director. She added that every time she would show a frustration that the largest accounts were given to men, she would be noted: “The team here thinks of you as Brad’s second income” referring to her husband . Lastly, Leavitt also accused Wells Fargo of the poor treatment of women in relation to men.

She said that male managers would have inappropriate sexual relation with female deputy workers, and often make derogatory statements about women. According to Leavitt, “financial institutions group is a self-acknowledged ‘boys club’ where ‘locker room talk’ on the sales floor is de rigueur.” Wells Fargo had no immediate comment. Leavitt joined the San Francisco-based bank in the year of 2013 after she came from Bear Stearns.

During her time at Wells Fargo, the Illinois resident said that her treatment deteriorated, so she filed a lawsuit. She is seeking damages and changes in the bank’s account assignment . In the year of 2020, Citigroup was sued by managing director Ardith Lindsey, who said the bank tolerated a “notoriously hostile” culture, where a former top equities banker subjected her to sexual harassment and death threats.

One year before that case, Goldman Sachs agreed to pay $215 million to settle a class action that alleges a widespread bias against the women in pay and promotion . Wells Fargo spent several years detaching from a series of scandals that came from mistreating the customers. These scandals resulted in billions in fines, replacing two chief executives, and a Federal Reserve cap on assets that limits its growth to this day. The case is Leavitt v Wells Fargo Securities LLC, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, No. 24-03140.

Continue Reading

Selfcare & Sexual Wellness

Phoenix Marie Sues Pornhub for $80 Million Over Forced Scene

Melissa Hutchison, known as Phoenix Marie, is suing the Pornhub owner Aylo and film director Danny Martin for $80 million, claiming she was forced to continue filming an orgy scene after her co-star suffered an overdose. Hutchison alleges this event led to a defamation campaign against her, significantly damaging her career and mental health.


  • Phoenix Marie sues for $80 million.
  • Claims forced filming after co-star’s overdose.
  • Alleges career damage and mental health issues.
  • Seeks justice for defamation and assault.

Reformulated Article: In a shocking legal battle, adult film actress Melissa Hutchison, better known by her stage name Phoenix Marie, is taking legal action against Pornhub owner Aylo and director Danny Martin, seeking $80 million in damages. This lawsuit stems from an incident where she was allegedly compelled to continue filming an orgy scene despite her co-star Zaawaadi overdosing during the shoot.

The situation unfolded in Barcelona in 2023 when Zaawaadi overdosed on lithium. Despite the severity of the situation, Hutchison claims that director Danny Martin, also known as Danny D, physically coerced her to remain on set and continue the scene, even after her repeated refusals.

The aftermath of the incident was just as troubling for Hutchison. She accuses the production company of launching a smear campaign that depicted her as unstable, which she believes led to significant career and personal losses, including lucrative brand deals. Hutchison also highlights the immense control Aylo holds over the industry, which she argues was used to isolate her professionally and personally, escalating her trauma and leading to severe mental health issues.

Adding to her claims, Hutchison asserts that she was offered a $60,000 settlement to sign a nondisclosure agreement, which she refused. Her legal team alleges that Aylo then intensified efforts to harm her financially by canceling her shoots and manipulating her visibility on their platforms.

Hutchison’s legal fight moved from Nevada state court to federal court due to jurisdictional challenges. Her initial claim was for $30 million, but her attorneys have indicated plans to increase this to $80 million. Through her lawsuit, Hutchison seeks not only financial redress but also a public reckoning for the harms she has endured, aiming to challenge the conglomerate’s alleged unregulated monopoly power.

Source: Dailymail.com

Continue Reading

Selfcare & Sexual Wellness

NFL’s Diversity Hiring Rule Faces Legal Attack

The NFL is currently under legal scrutiny from a conservative organization over its policy aimed at promoting diversity in hiring. The group America First Legal (AFL), which is led by Stephen Miller, a former advisor to Donald Trump, has filed a lawsuit against the NFL.

They argue that the NFL’s Rooney Rule, which requires teams to interview at least two minority candidates for head coaching, general manager, and coordinator positions, is in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Despite the rule, the NFL’s own diversity report reveals that 81% of head coach positions were filled by white coaches from 2012 to 2023. The Rooney Rule’s approach has been emulated across various industries, with many Fortune 500 companies adopting similar practices.

The AFL contends that the NFL’s policy unfairly limits job opportunities for individuals based on their race, effectively discriminating against them. Ian Prior, a senior advisor at AFL, has criticized the Rooney Rule as being demeaning, suggesting that interviews conducted under this rule are merely to fulfill a quota. He advocates for the NFL to adopt a merit-based hiring system instead. In defense, the NFL insists that its diversity initiatives comply with the law and uphold fairness, emphasizing its success in fostering diversity within the league.

This lawsuit is a part of AFL’s wider campaign against diversity and inclusion efforts in the corporate sector, accusing companies of engaging in illegal practices by attempting to diversify their workforce based on race and gender. Since its establishment in 2021 by Miller and Mark Meadows, AFL has targeted various organizations and government agencies, challenging their diversity policies. Meanwhile, evidence suggests that the Rooney Rule has not significantly improved the representation of Black coaches in top NFL positions.

Continue Reading
Advertisement amateur.tv
Advertisement Xlovecam.com
Advertisement sexyjobs.com
Advertisement modelsearcher.com